Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Midgley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Global inequality, power and the unipolar world

Implications for social work

James Midgley

Public Social Services at the School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Midg{at}berkeley.edu

English

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, neoconservative intellectuals and policy makers have promoted a unipolarist position which prescribes a new, unilateral role for the government of the United States in world affairs. This article discusses the concept of unipolarism and examines its implications for global inequality, social welfare and social work.

French

Aprè s l’effondrement de l’Union Soviétique, les intellectuels néoconservateurs et les stratèges se sont engagés dans la promotion d’une position unipolaire qui a prescrit un nouveau rô le unilatéral pour le gouvernement américain dans la gestion des affaires mondiales. Cet article aborde la notion d’unipolarité et en examine les conséquences en termes d’iné galités mondiales, de bien-ê tre social et de travail social.

Spanish

Siguiendo el colapso de la Unió n Sovié tica, los intelectuales neoconservadores y los creadores de política han promovido una posició n unipolar que prescribe un nuevo rol unilateral para el gobierno de los Estados Unidos en temas mundiales. Este artículo discute el concepto de unipolaridad y examina sus implicaciones para la desigualdad global, el bienestar social y el trabajo social.

Key Words: imperialism • inequality • international relations • international social work • unipolarism

International Social Work, Vol. 50, No. 5, 613-626 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020872807079919


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
A. J. Cocks, S. S. Al-Makhamreh, S. Abuieta, J. Alaedein, D. Forrester, and M. P. Sullivan
Facilitating the development of social work in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan: A collaboration between Jordan and the UK
International Social Work, November 1, 2009; 52(6): 799 - 810.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
R. Phillips
Food security and women's health: A feminist perspective for international social work
International Social Work, July 1, 2009; 52(4): 485 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
V. Sewpaul
On national identity, nationalism and Soccer 2010: Should social work be concerned?
International Social Work, March 1, 2009; 52(2): 143 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]